Make your own free website on
Enigmas Matrix

Internal E mails from workers / Ombudsman's office etc.

Fax from court july 21/06
Grand Jury: Ron is not guilty of kidnapping July 05
Social Worker, Katie Voegle's letter on our behalf.
Chelsea's letter to us
unfounded abuse letter on me
Guardian Ad Litem's Recommendation of placement of children 2006
DSS report says sexual perps in Kayela's home. Sept 03
Brandon's untreated ringworm 2003
Court Order On Custody 03
Matt Holt letter to Smiser, not paying Smiser to do his job!
Brandon 04 missed school days
Internal E mails, very interesting!
Jason Lene Probable Cause Statement and Judge Lewis Involvement in Ron's arrest July 05
Mary Clark lies to court in writing 2005
Sept. 17/03 DSS narratives
Official People On The Case
Amanda Kroner Letter May 13 / 04
removal petition brandon 04
Sexual maltreatment 2006
Sexual abuse 2003
Founded neglect 2004
About Me
Our Plight
Contact Me
Chelsea's feet : Foot Rot 2005
School Counselor Francine Nichols Notations on Brandon
Modification Order 06

I found these to be very interesting indeed!


Two issues here.
1. They don't represent abusers? Yet they are representing Kayela?  Mary Clark was going to testify on Kayela's behalf but yet she tells us that she can't get invovled in "custody disputes"!
2. Ron had contacted Legal Services prior to them taking the case for Kayela.  Ron discussed the case for over an hour with them and said they would represent him as soon as it got transferred to their county jurisdiction, the day after it was transferred, Ron contacted them literally when they opened and all of a sudden, it's a conflict of interest as they were representing Kayela.


We never got the first page of this e mail...interestingly.  I wonder what was so "tricky"?


McEniry was the ombudsman. We had faxed and e mailed that court order to her several times from 2003 through 2005.  I believe in fact, I have this in my sent folder in my e mail where I did e mail it to her before.  Ron and her had discussed it several times in regards to DSS saying he is non custodial!
Also, if she thought she was getting any inaccurate information from us, she should have asked us for a clarification and she never did.  I would have provided it to her.


This is most interesting.  We sent DSS a copy of the modification order in May of 04 when they got the case transferred to them, to make sure they had the "correct copy".
Again in 2004 during a grievance we filed on worker Steele, we handed a copy of it to Kyle Kendrick and Steele's supervisor, Deb Ziebarth.  So they had it several times.  They also informed us in May 04 that they already had a copy from Kayela.
Steele also says here that the COURT gave her a copy of order from 2002 as being the most recent order on custody.  We had told this worker countless times that there was a modification in 2003 and she CHOSE to ignore it.  So, she was WELL AWARE of this order.

Never give up hope.